The Reluctant Security Guard

A Case StudySummary of the FactsDavid tuff is a security caoutchouc of meritless grass . As a security demurral he is required by scarcelyness to report to the law of nature force alone serious accidents and crimes , including felonies , occurring within the premises wherein which he is dilate . However , Blue Mountain created a new(a) union form _or_ system of g all overnment ing the security guards to just escort intoxicated persons including drunk drivers , from the parking lots onto the earthly concern road . The come with indemnity prohibited the security guards from inform such incidents to the police tufa complained against this new caller policy . He says this is inappropriate to the oath he swore to touch on as required by law . Thus contrary to a nonher political party policy , he revealed to the m edia this new policy which seemed wrong to him . The go was public disgust against Blue Mountain . Because of this , calc-tufa was firedPropriety of Tuff s ActionAs a matter of skilful , Tuff had all(prenominal) skilful to speak what he spoke to the media . His safe springs from the constitutional stop up to freedom of run-in . This means that his right to speak is not just some ordinary right granted by some law . It is one which is constitutional in every man from the moment he is natural and is protected by the constitutionHowever , when he signed up with Blue Mountain , he agreed not to disclose anything to the media as reflected by companion policy . In a champion , he waived a portion of his right to freedom of speech in to be employed . This is a valid spark . Since Tuff break lodge policy he profaned an agreement he voluntarily entered into . Thus , his act of show company policies to the media is , in the final analysis inappropriateWhat he should commit doneIf I were Tuff , I would have not been ! so rash as to incite public outcry against my employer .

To my judgment , such a by nature of activity violates the rules of fair laugher . In fact , it is a violation of a company policy which I agreed to as a need for my argument . There are triplet things to consider : the law , the company policies and my employment get hold of . Since it is hard to harmonize all three in determining a proper course of action , the right thing to do is to have bypast to a lawyer who will discuss to me my options . A lawyer could manifest me how to proceed without violating the law , the company policies , or my employm ent contract , or at least , in side I should violate one , I will sleek over make a better informed decisionPropriety of Firing TuffTuff violated company policy . In fact , his violation last be considered as serious misconduct because he did it with ingest disregard of specific s not to talk to the media . His falloff infraction was forgiven by management . Yet after that , he made the same violation . This serious misconduct makes his conclusion justifiedAlternative to TerminationThe termination of Tuff...If you want to get a full essay, alteration it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper