The Innovator's Dilemma Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

The Innovators Dilemma - Case examine Exampleive technologies on incumbent firms, it would be prudent for the organization to balance its product portfolio by having both(prenominal) high-growth and low-growth products. Here, one could look at the 2.5 drive as the low-growth product and the 1.8 as the high-growth product. Also, as Christensen (Para 38) says most incumbents choke because of delay in making the strategic commitment to enter the emerging market. Choosing to offer the 1.8 drive promptly the organization lessens the likelihood of failing if the 1.8 turns out to be a disruptive technology.Christensen (Para 27) says that established firms are the leading(p) innovators in literally every other sustaining innovations in the drive industrys history. Merely investing in a new technology for fear that it could be a disruptive technology would be a superabundance of scarce resources. Those resources would be better spent in critically analysing the market. In todays chop-c hop changing business environment, the company should not merely focus on their current customers but on their non-consumers as well. The company should find out if there are ways that it could meet the needs of its non-consumers and because invest in developing that market. If developing the 1.8 would enable it to capture this new market, and if the markets projections express that it is sustainable then it should invest in the 1.8. Otherwise, the company should not venture into making the 1.8