UP Fair: A Sociological Analyis

Second week of February ? sounds familiar? Nah, I?m non referring to Valentine?s Day. It?s the ?Mardi Gras? of UP, I?m talking about, the unbeatable UP Fair. This über nonwithstandingt is the pinnacle of each activity there is in this university. It is the perfect(a) soma of euphoria, the state where everyone completely sets in all emotions held on to over the course free. It is the time when you scream all your frustrations, regrets, failures and disappointments, even jubilation and gratification. It is solely spectacular. However, it is non simply the event that arouses the dis port of fond scientists, it is generally the multitude. Yes, the flock of brainiacs and those not-so be a wonder, the perfect species to observe and scrutinize. perchance thousands of studies had already been conducted in their honor tho there is just something about this crowd that concurs you think and essay questions homogeneous ?How go in they coiffe that way?? or ?What could mo tion them to go unquiet?? My three years in UP has made me realise this event over and over again, thus, in this piece of writing, I attempt to explain the sociological concepts and conditions buns crowd port inside the UP Fair. Sociologically referred to as joint bearing1, this phenomenon consists of every feature that characterizes a crowd, one division of joint fashion. A crowd is defined as ?a gathering of sight who share a purpose or intent and incline one anformer(a)? (Wikibooks, 2005). Done seven-spot times a year, the university fair is the site where people meet, interact and sometimes settle one another. It, however, is not considered a free radical since it is limited, spare of social boundaries since people may come and go and lacks watertight and standard norms. More specifically, it is a cross among a received crowd and an expressive crowd since it is ? on purpose intend? but it ?does not develop any intent?. The University disciple Council allo ts a couple months for its preparation and d! esignates a boastful reckon for it to push through. Months of toil consume the organizers for the purpose of fashioning it a success. This preparation is reflected on the appearance of the venue, the count of organizations participating, the enumerate of bands playing, the weigh of available activities, the material body of people attending and also, the number of superfluous events taking place. However, the goal of the UP Fair is not explicitly stated by the organizers. It is simply a tryst for the part with of varying degrees of emotions, a place where people ?let their sensory hair down?, without forgetting ?acceptable sort?. Yes, most members of the crowd compose follow most norms of the larger society like watch for oneself and others and ?good manners?. Perhaps this is due to their understanding abilities or educational attainments or simply instincts. However, they can not cut across that the anonymity the crowd gives them makes them behave in ways they get out not do when inside and recognized in the ? pattern world?. The theoretical framework tail the demeanor of the UP crowd is verified by the Emergent-Norm Theory of food turner and Killian (1987). This theory states that ?collective demeanor is characterized by differences in reflectance and emotions?. Members possessing divergent views express it in divergent ways, sometimes, not blatantly doing so. However, ?in the interactions that follow the development of the crowd, un act expectations and norms can emerge, allowing for fashion that normally would not take place.? Similarly, the crowd gathering during UP Fair is composed of different people with different norms, behavior and self-expression. Consequently, in the process of interacting with each other during the event, a cutting kind of norm emerges and ironically, the crowd begins to act according to it. We could answer for people listening to and applauding not-so-famous bands, contrary to what they would do outsi de the crowd. The choppy norm is the respect for al! l kinds of bands. Also, even sociolects transpire during these interactions. many words are integrated in the lexicon of people as the word ?astig? and the like. In Smelser?s Value-Added Approach (1962), he enumerates certain(prenominal)(a) conditions which may bring about collective behavior. First is structural conduciveness or the existence of conditions for collective behavior to be possible.

In the event of UP Fair, though built from tradition, it is not precisely the see to it of fun and striking time that make them behave in such way, it is also existence of certain environments they are immersed into that mak e them want to escape. Second is structural strain or the conflicts or problems resulting from a gap between expectation and reality. A number of structural strains can be perceived behind the UP Fair, political, social, emotional, and others. though mere teenagers or pre-adults, students also let the inflammation besetting the human race. They are constantly bombarded with problems (personal, social, political or academic) and all types of pressures, therefore, also needing a way to relieve the strain. Though the other three conditions may not be ably utilize to the UP Fair crowd, it is, indeed, a form of collective behavior and like others; it can bring about changes in social structures and policies. It opens gates for diverse ethnic groups to interact, thus resulting to a advance understanding of gardening for students. It also turns them into more respectful, understanding, socially awake and socially active individuals. Furthermore, it is the place where great ideas ra in buckets forth, where great stories are made and gr! eat values are learned. It is not only the agora for self-expression; it is also the site where different organizations with certain convictions and beliefs rise, hoping to develop further into institutions with strong ideals. They say that ?collective behavior may result in new directions of the culture and the presidency of new folkways, mores and values?. The case of the University of the Philippines Fair is a tried and tested formula for this. Sources:Panopio, Isabel, Felicidad Cordero-MacDonald and Adelisa Raymund. 1995. Sociology:Focus on the Phlippines. Quezon city: awareness Incorporated. _____________. Introduction to Sociology/Collective Behavior. May, 2005. July, 2006. If you want to get a skilful essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper